Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Mar 31.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Epidemiol. 2008 Feb 8;37(2):386–396. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyn013

TABLE 5.

Association between personality measures and mortality from external causes (accidents and suicides), 1993–2003-Cox regression

RII (95% CI) for mortality from external causes
Personality measures Model 1 Model 2 Model 3§
N event/N total††
Bortner rating scale
Type- A behaviour pattern 50/14 196 0.81 (0.31–2.12) 0.88 (0.33–2.32)

Buss-Durkee hostility Inventory
Total hostility 46/13 922 2.76 (0.99–7.69) 2.65 (0.95–7.42)
Neurotic hostility 49/14 019 3.97 (1.44–10.94)** 3.67 (1.31–10.22)** 3.24 (1.03–10.18)*
Reactive hostility 49/14 014 1.65 (0.62–4.39) 1.63 (0.61–4.32)

Grossarth-Maticek and Eysenck’s Personality-Stress Inventory
Cancer-prone-Type 1 47/14 045 1.04 (0.38–2.85) 1.00 (0.37–2.75)
CHD-prone-Type 2 47/13 984 0.97 (0.35–2.68) 0.92 (0.33–2.52)
Ambivalent-Type 3 46/13 999 2.33 (0.83–6.53) 2.13 (0.76–5.95)
Healthy-Type 4 46/14 000 0.50 (0.17–1.42) 0.50 (0.18–1.40)
Rational-Type 5 47/13 999 1.18 (0.43–3.25) 1.18 (0.43–3.25)
Anti social-Type 6 47/14 040 3.48 (1.23–9.85)** 3.40 (1.19–9.69)** 2.13 (0.69–6.58)
*

p ≤ 0.05,

**

p ≤ 0.01,

***

p ≤ 0.001

Model 1= RII adjusted for age and sex.

Model 2= Model 1 + additionally adjusted for educational level, and marital status.

§

Model 3=Model 2 + additionally mutually adjusted for personality measures predicting mortality in Model 2

††

N events in table differ with each personality and models 1 and 2 are complete case analysis.