Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jun 8.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Brain Res. 2009 Jan 8;200(1):95–99. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.12.034

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Using a four hour retention interval, Tg2576 exhibit a novel object recognition deficit; FK506 treatment reverses this deficit. Two-way ANOVA detected a treatment, genotype and an interaction. Treatment: p=0.003; F(1,121)=8.97. Genotype: p=0.039; F=4.32. Interaction: p=0.05; F=4.88. One-way ANOVA found no significant difference between the performance of WT given saline or FK506 (p>0.05; F(3,106)=5.51) whereas Tg2576 treated with saline performed significantly worse than WT (#p<0.05); Tg2576 treated with FK506 performed significantly better than Tg2576 given saline (*p<0.01).