Skip to main content
. 2009 Jan 1;91(1):3–13. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00338

TABLE III.

Comparison of Crude, Regression, and Marginal Structural Model Estimates of Effect of Treatment Time on Mortality

Estimate >12 to 24 Hr >24 to 48 Hr >48 to 120 Hr >120 Hr
Crude relative risk*
 Point estimate 0.50 (0.18 to 1.01) 1.13 (0.58 to 2.05) 1.19 (0.67 to 2.03) 1.17 (0.24 to 2.65)
 P value 0.06 0.69 0.52 0.77
IPTW relative risk*
 Point estimate 0.45 (0.15 to 0.98) 0.83 (0.43 to 1.44) 0.58 (0.28 to 0.93) 0.43 (0.10 to 0.94)
 P value 0.03 0.49 0.03 0.03
Standardized risk ratio*
 Point estimate 0.47 (0.14 to 1.11) 0.94 (0.44 to 1.76) 0.58 (0.21 to 1.09) 0.43 (0.09 to 0.94)
 P value 0.07 0.85 0.09 0.05
*

The point estimates are given with the 95% confidence intervals in parentheses. For all analyses, the t0 group (treated at twelve hours or less) was used as the referent group.

Inverse probability of treatment-weighted (IPTW) relative risk estimates were generated using a model for treatment assignment controlling for the subset of covariates with bivariate associations with mortality (Wm): New Injury Severity Score, Glasgow Coma Scale score, Northeast region, age, arrival time, the number of serious extremity/pelvic or head/neck injuries, the number of femoral fractures, the presence of cardiac or cerebrovascular comorbidities, teaching status, and American College of Surgeons level-1 designation.

The standardized risk ratio analysis involved the use of the same treatment model as inverse probability of treatment-weighted analysis but modified weights to give the estimated proportionate risk that would have been observed if the subjects in the early treatment group (group t0) had received treatment at a later time.