Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Mar 31.
Published in final edited form as: Diabetes Care. 2001 Oct;24(10):1711–1721. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.10.1711

Table 2.

Average annual rates of change in BMI: predicted and observed*

Sex Baseline–Year 1 Years 1, 2, and 3 Years 3, 4, 5, and 6 Years 6, 7, 8, and 9 P value
Female
  Conventional
    Predicted 0.2974 0.1512 0.1589 0.1681
    Observed 0.3685 0.2228 0.1579 0.2495
    n 278 276 226 67
  Intensive
    Predicted 0.9925 0.4267 0.3999 0.3677 0.0005
    Observed 1.1103 0.4892 0.3080 0.3325
    n 301 298 246 73
  P value for difference between groups 0.0001 0.0002 0.0058 0.3870
Male
  Conventional
    Predicted 0.3903 0.1316 0.1148 0.0946
    Observed 0.4026 0.1511 0.1402 0.1324
    n 347 347 280 76
  Intensive
    Predicted 1.1335 0.3797 0.2940 0.1913 <0.0001
    Observed 1.0926 0.4575 0.3172 0.2323
    n 316 314 256 73
  P value for difference between groups <0.0001 <0.0001 0.0082 0.3573
*

The upper figure of each pair is the average annual change in BMI predicted by the growth-curve model during the interval in question. The lower figure is the observed average rate of change for the same period. P values for the treatment-group difference in observed rates of change are from the Wilcoxon’s rank-sum test (baseline–year 1) or the Wei-Lachin test of stochastic ordering, applied separately for all other periods.

P value for test of trends over time, based on observed rates, between treatment groups within sex.