Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ear Hear. 2008 Oct;29(5):800–813. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31817e73ef

Confusion matrix for 2-channel condition. Each stimulus was identified eighty times (each of the four talkers' utterances was identified twice, resulting in eight identifications by each of ten different listeners for each phoneme).

Stimulus
/aða/ /aba/ /ada/ /afa/ /aga/ /aka/ /ama/ /ana/ /apa/ /asa/ /a∫a/ /ata/ /aθa/ /ava/ /aza/ /aʒa/
Response /aða/ 3 0 0 3 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 1 4 4 6
/aba/ 11 71 63 3 48 0 9 9 2 0 0 0 2 16 0 0
/ada/ 1 4 12 0 8 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 5 0 0
/afa/ 1 1 0 52 0 0 0 0 0 57 28 0 59 0 8 0
/aga/ 5 1 3 0 12 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 1 6 0 0
/aka/ 1 1 0 0 2 53 0 0 18 0 0 16 0 0 0 0
/ama/ 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 25 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
/ana/ 1 0 0 0 0 0 15 29 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
/apa/ 0 1 1 1 5 13 0 0 51 0 0 25 0 0 0 0
/asa/ 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 8 15 0 6 0 0 4
/a∫a/ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 33 0 0 0 2 2
/ata/ 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 6 0 0 39 0 0 0 0
/aθa/ 0 1 0 17 0 0 1 1 0 7 3 0 10 0 2 1
/ava/ 56 0 1 2 4 0 10 10 0 0 0 0 1 46 48 34
/aza/ 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 10
/aʒa/ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 12 23