Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ear Hear. 2008 Oct;29(5):800–813. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31817e73ef

Confusion matrix for 4-channel condition. Each stimulus was identified eighty times (each of the four talkers' utterances was identified twice, resulting in eight identifications by each often different listeners for each phoneme).

Stimulus
/aða/ /aba/ /ada/ /afa/ /aga/ /aka/ /ama/ /ana/ /apa/ /asa/ /a∫a/ /ata/ /aθa/ /ava/ /aza/ /aʒa/
Response /aða/ 11 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 7 3 2
/aba/ 5 75 48 1 24 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 2 11 0 0
/ada/ 3 1 22 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0
/afa/ 1 0 0 50 0 0 0 0 1 10 2 0 39 0 0 0
/aga/ 4 1 8 1 41 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0
/aka/ 0 0 0 0 0 58 0 1 6 0 0 6 0 0 0 0
/ama/ 0 2 0 0 0 0 65 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
/ana/ 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
/apa/ 0 1 1 0 3 3 0 0 61 0 0 6 0 2 0 0
/asa/ 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 42 39 1 11 1 3 3
/a∫a/ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 39 0 2 0 0 2
/ata/ 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 0 12 0 0 66 0 0 0 0
/aθa/ 2 0 0 18 0 0 0 2 0 9 0 0 19 0 1 0
/ava/ 52 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 2 0 0 4 51 12 4
/aza/ 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 2 43 26
/aʒa/ 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 43