Skip to main content
. 2008 Nov 27;38(2):538–548. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyn242

Table 2.

Model fit indices for the Base SEM and Models A through G using birth cohort data from the CLHNS (n = 2653)

χ2; df; P* RMSEA p-close CFI IFI TLI BIC
Base SEM 18.41; 20; 0.56 0.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 −139.26
Model A LFE→SBPa 19.12; 21; 0.58 0.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.001 −146.44
Model B LFE→BWa 18.61; 21; 0.61 0.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.001 −146.95
Model C LFE→CWa 31.71; 21; 0.06 0.014 1.000 0.999 0.999 0.998 −133.85
Model D CW→SBPa 18.59; 21; 0.61 0.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.001 −146.97
Model E Z4↔Z3a 19.04; 21; 0.58 0.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.001 −146.52
Model F AFA→LFEa 19.92; 21; 0.53 0.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 −145.64
Model G AFA↔HTa 21.67; 21; 0.42 0.002 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 −143.89
Uncorrelated variables model 11491.11; 56; 0.00 0.277 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 114249.64

*All P-values are two sided.

aPath constrained as equal for males and females.