Skip to main content
. 2009 Jan 24;30(7):782–788. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn577

Table 3.

Outcome at 18 months’ follow-up

Value Estimate 95% CI P-value P-value for interactiona
Difference in mean NYHA
 Non-IHD −0.53 −0.74 to −0.33 <0.0001 0.30
 IHD −0.69 −0.69 <0.0001

End of study status (odds ratio)
 Non-IHD 0.52 0.35 to 0.76 0.0009 0.49
 IHD 0.42 0.27 to 0.66 0.0001

Difference in mean MR
 Non-IHD 4.77 1.12 to 8.42 0.0109 0.83
 IHD 4.16 −0.44 to 8.75 0.0755

LVEF (%)
 Non-IHD 8.50 10.14 to 6.85 <0.0001 0.003
 IHD 4.53 6.24 to 2.82 <0.0001

LVESV (cm3)
 Non-IHD −58.52 45.56 to 71.49 <0.0001 0.01
 IHD −35.68 20.80 to 50.56 <0.0001

NT-proBNP
 Non-IHD −1231.24 −1992.53 to −469.96 0.0016 0.97
 IHD −1137.89 −2441.17 to 165.38 0.0866

Difference in mean QRS
 Non-IHD −19.8 −25.5 to −14.1 <0.0001 0.03
 IHD −9.7 −16.4 to −2.9 0.0052

IHD, ischaemic heart disease; MLWHF, Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire; MR, mitral regurgitation.

aBetween effect of treatment and ischaemia.