Table 3.
Value | Estimate | 95% CI | P-value | P-value for interactiona |
---|---|---|---|---|
Difference in mean NYHA | ||||
Non-IHD | −0.53 | −0.74 to −0.33 | <0.0001 | 0.30 |
IHD | −0.69 | −0.69 | <0.0001 | |
End of study status (odds ratio) | ||||
Non-IHD | 0.52 | 0.35 to 0.76 | 0.0009 | 0.49 |
IHD | 0.42 | 0.27 to 0.66 | 0.0001 | |
Difference in mean MR | ||||
Non-IHD | 4.77 | 1.12 to 8.42 | 0.0109 | 0.83 |
IHD | 4.16 | −0.44 to 8.75 | 0.0755 | |
LVEF (%) | ||||
Non-IHD | 8.50 | 10.14 to 6.85 | <0.0001 | 0.003 |
IHD | 4.53 | 6.24 to 2.82 | <0.0001 | |
LVESV (cm3) | ||||
Non-IHD | −58.52 | 45.56 to 71.49 | <0.0001 | 0.01 |
IHD | −35.68 | 20.80 to 50.56 | <0.0001 | |
NT-proBNP | ||||
Non-IHD | −1231.24 | −1992.53 to −469.96 | 0.0016 | 0.97 |
IHD | −1137.89 | −2441.17 to 165.38 | 0.0866 | |
Difference in mean QRS | ||||
Non-IHD | −19.8 | −25.5 to −14.1 | <0.0001 | 0.03 |
IHD | −9.7 | −16.4 to −2.9 | 0.0052 |
IHD, ischaemic heart disease; MLWHF, Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire; MR, mitral regurgitation.
aBetween effect of treatment and ischaemia.