Skip to main content
. 2009 Mar 23;106(13):5019–5024. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812525106

Table 2.

Morphology of maize starch grains recovered from the Xihuatoxtla stone tools

Provenience Tool Cat. no. Shape
Hilum cavity Compression Facets
Fissures
Round Oval Bell Irregular Slight Defined Transverse Total with fissures n
Unit 1
Ceramic
Layer B 310a 0 17 0 83 0 33 67 17 67 6
312a 0 0 0 100 0 100 0 100 100 1
Layer C 314c 46 0 0 54 46 73 27 0 18 11
315c 11 0 0 89 11 44 56 33 77 18
Preceramic
Layer D 316c 0 0 0 100 100 50 50 0 50 2
316d 9 0 3 88 19 26 74 23 46 68
Layer E 318e 13 1 0 86 35 19 81 25 61 80
318d 5 0 0 90 18 9 91 41 74 22
319d 12 0 0 88 12 38 62 0 50 8
322c 9 0 0 91 9 27 73 36 72 11
Unit 2
Ceramic
Layer B 361a 33 0 0 67 33 33 67 0 67 3
362a 25 0 0 75 5 38 62 12 37 8
364a 0 0 0 100 0 33 67 64 64 3
365 50 0 0 50 0 50 50 50 50 2
Layer C 365a 4 0 0 96 42 33 67 32 64 25
365b 0 0 0 100 0 20 80 40 60 5
366a 50 0 0 50 0 50 50 50 100 2
Preceramic
Layer D 367a 44 0 0 56 11 78 22 0 33 9
368a 0 0 0 100 33 0 100 33 99 3
Scrapers
Unit 1
Ceramic (B) 308 0 0 0 100 0 0 100 100 100 1
Preceramic 322 0 0 0 100 25 25 75 0 25 4
Unit 2
Preceramic 370 0 0 0 100 25 12 88 25 75 8

n, total number of grains present on each tool. The numbers represent the percentages of each attribute present in the starch grain assemblages. See Table S2 for the same analysis of modern varieties of teosinte and Mexican maize.