Table 2.
Model, Å* | ΔE† | ΔH‡ | ΔS | TΔS | ΔG |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5§ | 5.8 (0.5) | 4.7 (0) | 37 (38) | 10.9 (11.3) | −6.2 (11.9) |
2.9¶ | 5.0 (0.4) | 3.8 | 34 | 10.1 | −6.3 |
4.0¶ | 4.6 (0) | 3.2 | 21 | 6.4 | −3.2 |
*Reduced Cu site model: [Cu(Im)2(SCH3)(S(CH3)2)].
†Total electronic energy change for loss of Met ligand.
‡ΔE with zero-point and thermal corrections included: H = Eelectronic + EZPE + Evib + Erot + Etrans + RT. ZPE = zero point energy. The results of PCM calculations are shown in the parentheses. ΔE, ΔH, TΔS, and ΔG are in kcal/mol, and ΔS is in cal/mol·K.
§The dCu–S(thioether) distance is obtained from full geometry optimization.
¶The dCu–S(thioether) distance is constrained as indicated.