Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Apr 1;34(7):718–724. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819792b0

Table 5.

Utilization of Treatments in the Previous Year Among Careseekers (n=590)

Treatment Use, percent (95% CI) Number of treatmentsa Mean (95% CI) ACP Cochrane
Traction 5.9 (3.7 – 8.2) not asked Not effective 4
Corset or brace 19.0 (15.3 – 22.7) not asked Unable to estimate 5
Used TENS unit 18.9 (15.2 – 22.6) not asked Unable to estimate Unclear6
Traction or corset or TENS 33.5 (29.1 – 37.9) N/A
Spinal manipulation 21.5 (17.7 – 25.4) 21.0 (15.4 – 26.6) Moderate +7
Injection 24.3 (20.3 – 28.3) 3.9 (1.6 – 6.2)
In spine rehabilitation/work hardening prog. 3.4 (1.9 – 4.9) not asked Moderate +8 9
Prescribed exercise by a provider 45.9 (41.3 – 50.6) N/A Small-moderate +10
Electro-stimulation during visit 21.2 (17.5 – 24.8) 19.6 (11.4 – 27.8) Unable to estimate
Heat 39.4 (34.8 – 43.9) 38.0 (29.0 – 46.9) Unable to estimate 11
Cold packs 43.6 (39.0 – 48.2) 30.7 (24.1 – 37.3) 28
Received/used shoe inserts 14.6 (11.3 – 17.8) not asked 12
Ultrasound 16.3 (12.9 – 19.7) 7.6 (4.3 – 10.9) Unable to estimate
Received dietary instruction 18.7 (15.1 – 22.3) not asked
Acupuncture 5.8 (3.6 – 7.9) 9.2 (5.5 – 13.0) Moderate +13
Therapeutic massage 16.1 (12.7 – 19.5) 14.0 (7.9 – 20.0) Moderate +14
a

conditional on receiving one treatment