. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Mar 17.

Published in final edited form as: Behav Brain Res. 2008 Nov 27;198(2):298–305. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.11.033

Table 2.

Akaike weights for models within each lesion group.

Group	Model
Group	None	a	δ	λ	a, δ	a, λ	δ, λ	a, δ, λ
Control	.35	.17	.13	.14	.07	.07	.06	.02
Unilateral Severe	.01	.04	.50	.01	.18	.03	.17	.06
Moderate	.13	.07	.20	.24	.10	.09	.12	.04
Severe	.00	.00	.53	.02	.16	.04	.19	.06

Note. Models are labeled with the parameters that could vary freely between pre-and post-lesion conditions (column headers). The Akaike weight is indicative of the relative strength of a model being best among those compared within each lesion group (rows add to 1). The best model for each lesion group is underlined.