Skip to main content
. 2009 Mar 18;5(3):265–275. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.5.265

Table 3.

Cross-section structural geometric properties of the femur and tibia were evaluated using micro-CT. Note: Summary of morphometric characteristics in the two groups which were different in body weight-bearing. *A statistically significant difference was detected between the two groups only in the trabecular number (Tb.N.) of the femur (p < 0.05) at the age of 20 weeks.

Position Group BV/TV (%) SD Tb.Th (mm) SD Tb.N (1/mm) SD
hip Group A (n=20) (ad libitum diet) 60.66 6.13 0.094 0.0069 6.42 0.45
Group B (n=20) (controlled diet) 62.76 6.5 0.093 0.0075 6.76 0.55
P value 0.347 0.412 0.038*
knee Group A (n=20) (ad libitum diet) 52.75 3.94 0.094 0.0063 5.63 0.34
Group B (n=20) (controlled diet) 54.64 7.48 0.093 0.0084 5.90 0.52
P value 0.325 0.561 0.058