Skip to main content
. 2009 Mar 18;49(1):12–22. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnp004

Table 2.

Fixed Effects in Level 2 Hierarchical Linear Modeling Equations

Model 0a Model 1b Model 2ac Model 2bd
Intercept: Mean (,00) 47.65***,e 43.40*** 43.19*** 43.20***
Slope: Mean (,10) −0.19f −0.81 −0.55 −0.44
CG status (,11) 0.64** 0.34 0.27
T1 Ham D (,12) −0.19***
T2 Ham D (,12) −0.20***
Deviance statistic (−2 log likelihood, no. of estimated parameters = 4) 4,683.48 4,571.24 4,568.04 4,568.88

Notes: CG = caregiver; Ham D = Hamilton depression.

a

Model 0: unconditional linear growth model, with no predictors at Level 2.

b

Model 1: CG status predicting digit symbol test decline.

c

Model 2a: CG status predicting digit symbol test decline, with Hamilton T1 as a mediator.

d

Model 2b: CG status predicting digit symbol test decline, with Hamilton T2 as a mediator.

e

For all models, covariates for intercept equation: age, education, gender, obesity, and stroke history.

f

Covariates for slope equation: age, gender, obesity, and stroke history.

*p < .10. **p < .05. ***p < .01.