Skip to main content
. 2008 Jun 19;35(7):3205–3214. doi: 10.1118/1.2938731

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Reconstructed TAT image: (a) Using the filtered back-projection method when skull was absent; (b) using the filtered back-projection method when skull was present; (c) using the proposed numerical method when skull was present; (d) comparison of the reconstructed signals at the depth as marked on (a), (b), and (c). We shifted the positions of the plots for (b) and (c) along the y axis by −0.3 and −0.7, respectively.