Skip to main content
. 2009 Apr 1;91(4):839–849. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00538

TABLE IV.

Regional and Total Surface Damage Scores for the Retrieved Tibial Inserts Classified According to Processing Conditions (Sterilization Procedure, Consolidation Method, and Polyethylene Resin Type)*

Processing Conditions Condylar Damage Score Backside Damage Score Post Damage Score Total Surface Damage Score
Gamma-air, direct compression molded, 1900H 48 ± 27 17 ± 8 NA 56 ± 36
Gamma-air, extruded, GUR 4150 48 ± 18 14 ± 7 19 ± 7 69 ± 24
Gamma-air, molded, GUR 1050 49 ± 27 20 ± 11 15 ± 9 84 ± 46
Gamma-inert, molded, 1900H 23 ± 7 10 ± 9 14 ± 8 47 ± 2
Gamma-inert, direct compression molded, 1900H 35 ± 19 10 ± 6 12 ± 7 54 ± 27
Gamma-inert, molded, GUR 1050 37 ± 11 16 ± 7 14 ± 8 64 ± 22
Gamma-inert, molded, GUR 1020 31 ± 10 8 ± 5 9 ± 4 45 ± 16
*

The values are given as the average and the standard deviation.

NA = Not applicable (nonmodular designs, direct compression-molded onto metal backing, cruciate-retaining designs).