Skip to main content
. 2009 Mar;11(2):117–130. doi: 10.2353/jmoldx.2009.080070

Table 3.

Classification of ER Status of the Discovery and Validation Sets Using the ΔΔCT Cutoff-Point and Clustering Methods

Discovery (n = 67)
Validation (n = 333)
ΔΔCTcutoff-point
Clustering
ΔΔCTcutoff-point
Clustering
Allred TS* IHC (% of total) ER+ ER− ER+ ER− IHC (% of total) ER+ ER− ER+ ER−
0 17 2 15 0 17 17 1 16 0 17
2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 2
ER− 17 (25%) 2 15 0 17 19 (6%) 1 18 0 19
3 2 0 2 0 2 4 0 4 0 4
4 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 1 1
5 3 3 0 3 0 6 6 0 4 2
6 2 2 0 2 0 31 31 0 28 3
7 12 12 0 12 0 110 110 0 110 0
8 31 31 0 31 0 161 161 0 160 1
ER+ 50 (75%) 48 2 48 2 314 (94%) 310 4 303 11
*

Allred total score.

Total number of specimens with Allred TS0 and TS2 in each set.

Total number of specimens with Allred TS3 to TS8 in each set.