Skip to main content
. 2008 Oct;10(5):734–744. doi: 10.1215/15228517-2008-034

Table 3.

Significant differences in synchronization likelihood between patients and controls per frequency band and accompanying statistics

Synchronization Likelihood (mean ± SD)a
Model
Frequency/Area Patients (n= 17) Controls (n= 17) b SEb β R2 F-statistic p value
Delta (0.5–4 Hz)
 Left parieto-occipital 0.041 ± 0.009 0.035 ± 0.007 −7.30E–02 0.030 −0.398 0.234 2–32 0.018
 Right frontoparietal 0.029 ± 0.005 0.024 ± 0.004 −7.65E–02 0.025 −0.487 0.237 1–32 0.004
 Right parieto-occipital 0.049 ± 0.019 0.039 ± 0.008 −8.52E–02 0.038 −0.333 0.339 2–32 0.002
 Interparietal 0.046 ± 0.038 0.038 ± 0.006 −8.61E–02 0.032 −0.434 0.189 1–32 0.012
 Intertemporal 0.057 ± 0.016 0.080 ± 0.027 0.155 0.047 0.510 0.261 1–32 0.002
Theta (4–8 Hz)
 Left frontotemporal 0.023 ± 0.005 0.019 ± 0.003 −7.02E–02 0.028 −0.412 0.170 1–32 0.017
 Right frontotemporal 0.026 ± 0.006 0.022 ± 0.005 −7.10E–02 0.031 −0.350 0.312 2–32 0.004
 Right temporo-occipital 0.026 ± 0.005 0.023 ± 0.005 −6.06E–02 0.028 −0.357 0.128 1–32 0.041
Lower alpha (8–10 Hz)
 Interoccipital 0.039 ± 0.009 0.048 ± 0.010 9.40E–02 0.032 0.456 0.208 1–33 0.007
Lower gamma (30–45 Hz)
 Right frontoparietal 0.015 ± 0.000 0.015 ± 0.001 −8.52E–03 0.004 −0.299 0.390 2–33 0.000

Abbreviations: b, regression coefficient; SEb, standard error of b; R2, explained variance.

a

Significantly higher synchronization likelihood is shown in boldface.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure