TABLE 2.
Force pattern types obtained via intraspinal microstimulation of the L5–L7 cord
| Cat ID | Force Pattern Type |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RF | RE | CF | CE | |
| OC-1 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| OC-2 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| OC-3 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Train-1 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Train-2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Train-3 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 5 |
| Train-4 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Train-5 | 5 | 2 | 13 | 2 |
| NTF-1 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| NTF-2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| NTF-3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| NTF-4 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| NTF-5 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 4 |
| Combo-1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 |
| Combo-2 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Combo-3 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
The number of force pattern types obtained via intraspinal microstimulation of the L5–L7 cord for each spinal cat studied. There were no significant differences in the number of RF, RE, and CE force patterns between the individual cats (χ2, P > 0.05). However, the number of CF force patterns obtained from the fifth trained cat (Train-5) was significantly greater than from the other animals (χ2, P ≤ 0.05).