Skip to main content
. 2009 Apr;4(4):755–762. doi: 10.2215/CJN.02730608

Table 1.

Characteristics of studies included in the analysis

Study (Year) Publication Cohort Descriptiona N Treatment Period (weeks) Dialysis Target Hb/Hct Hemoglobin, mean g/dl (SD)
SBP, mean mmHg (SD)
DBP, mean mmHg (SD)
LVMi, mean gm/m2 (SD)
Δ LVMi
Baseline Final Baseline Final Baseline Final Baseline Final
Cannella (1990) Clin Nephrol Treated 9 26 Y 10 g/dl 5.9 (1.30) 10.2 (1.30) 115 (17) 112 (19) 70 (5) 73 (14) 115 (17) 78 (14) −37
Pascual (1991) Clin Nephrol (i) Hypertensive 8 52 Y 30-35% 159 (7) 145 (12) 96 (8) 87 (9) 235 (40) 168 (51) −67.2
(ii) Normotensive 7 52 Y 30-35% 6.4 (0.90) 10.5 (0.90) 133 (10) 122 (11) 82 (10) 75 (9) 183 (43) 107 (24) −75.8
Portoles (1997) Kidney Int Treated 11 26 N 35% 9 (1.0) 11.7 (1.30) 144 (32.5) 147.2 (31.2) 76.0 (20.90) 81.1 (15.3) 178 (68) 147 (68) −30.9
Massimetti (1998) Blood Purif Treated 11 65 Y 30-35% 8.4 (0.80) 10.9 (1.20) 155 (12) 154 (24) 87 (7) 85 (9) 186 (56) 189 (39) 3
Foley (2000) Kidney Int (i) CLVH / Lower Hb 36 48 Y 9.5-10.5 g/dl 10.1 (0.60) 10.5 (1.20) 157 (11.8) NA 81 (8.9) NA 139 (25) 145.1 (NA) 6.1
(ii) CLVH / Higher Hb 34 48 Y 13-14 g/dl 10.0 (0.90) 12.8 (1.10) 162 (12.9) NA 82 (7.2) NA 147 (26) 148.1 (NA) 1.1
(iii) LVD / Lower Hb 37 48 Y 9.5-10.5 g/dl 10.0 (0.60) 10.7 (1.00) 155 (15) NA 82 (9.0) NA 165 (50) 160 (NA) −5.1
(iv) LVDc / higher Hb 39 48 Y 13-14 g/dl 10.3 (0.60) 12.8 (2.20) 154 (18.5) NA 84 (9.3) NA 172 (36) 166 (NA) −5.8
Hayashi (2000) Am J Kidney Dis Partial Hct correctionb 9 16 N 30% 7.9 (0.5)c 10.7 (0.6)c 147.8 (23.1) 151.3(22.8) 74.2 (14.70) 76.5(7.8) 141 (36) 127 (30) −13.7
London (2001) J Am Soc Nephrol Treated 153 54 (37)d Y 10-11 g/dl 8.7 (1.70) 10.5 (1.50) 169.4 (29.7) 146.7 (29) 90.2 (15.60) 78 (14) 174 (45) 162 (45) −12
Sikole (2002) Artificial Organs Treated 14 52 Y 30-35% 7.9 (1.40) 10.0 (1.00) NAe NAe NAg NAg 172 (29) 129 (26) −43.4
Frank (2004) Kidney Int Treated 23 28 Y 12.5 g/dl 10.5 (0.90) 13.4 (3.10) 132 (4) 128 (3) 76 (2) 73 (2) 134 (26) 97 (25) −37
Roger (2004) J Am Soc Nephrol (i) Lower Hb 78 104 Mixedf 9-10 g/dl 11.2 (0.80) 10.8 (1.30) 137 (18) 133 (20) 81 (10) 77 (11) 101 (23) 105 (24) 4
(ii) Higher Hb 74 104 Mixedf 12-13 g/dl 11.2 (0.90) 12.1 (1.40) 139 (19) 138 (23) 80 (11) 79 (12) 105 (23) 107 (25) 2
Ayus (2005) Kidney Int Treated 40 26 N 12 g/dl 9.1 (0.70) 11.3 (1.90) 148 (21) 146 (18) 82 (11) 81 (9) 157 (56) 142 (56) −15
Hampl (2005) Kidney Blood Press Res Treated 230 229 Y 13.5-14.5 g/dl 11.2 (2.20) 14.1 (1.40) 165 (8) 130 (10) 92 (8) 80 (5) 159 (50.4) 130.2 (42.7) −28.8
Levin (2005) Am J Kidney Dis (i) Lower Hb 74 104 Mixedf 9-10.5 g/dl 11.7 (0.80) 11.4 (NA) 140.5(18.6) 133.4 (NA) 79.6 (10.50) 75.1 (NA) 98 (25) 104 (NA) 5.2
(ii) Higher Hb 78 104 Mixedf 12-14 g/dl 11.8 (0.80) 12.7 (NA) 137.1(17.5) 133.9 (NA) 75.8 (11.50) 75.6 (NA) 101 (22) 101 (NA) 0.4
Parfrey (2005) J Am Soc Nephrol (i) Lower Hb 300 96 Y 9.5-11.5 g/dl 11.0 (1.20) 10.9 (1.20) 140 (20) 139 (22) 80 (12) 79 (14) 112 (33) 128 (40) 16.3
(ii) Higher Hb 296 96 Y 13.5-14.5 g/dl 11.0 (1.20) 13.3 (1.50) 144 (21.65) 141 (22.14) 81 (11.48) 80 (12.57) 117 (36) 128 (43) 11.8
Ritz (2007) Am J Kidney Dis (i) Lower Hb 82 60 Mixedf 10.5-11.5 g/dl 11.7 12.1 (NA) 133 (NA) 134 (NA) 80 (NA) 80 (NA) 116 (35) 117 (36) 0.5
(ii) Higher Hb 88 60 Mixedf 13-15 g/dl 11.9 13.5 (NA) 134 (NA) 134 (NA) 78 (NA) 76 (NA) 114 (31) 112 (33) −1.2

Y, yes; N, no; CLVH, concentric left ventricular hypertrophy; LVD, left ventricular dilation.

a

Reporting only for cohorts treated with EPO.

b

Same study cohort evaluated at two targets. Only the results for partial-correction are reported here.

c

Hematocrit has been converted to hemoglobin by dividing by 3.

d

By patient, mean (SD).

e

Mean arterial pressure increased from 114.7 ± 13.9 at baseline to 119.3 ± 13.8 mmHg at end of treatment period (where mean arterial pressure = diastolic arterial pressure + [systolic arterial pressure + diastolic arterial pressure]/3).

f

These cohorts are classified as CKD for the purpose of this analysis. The following are numbers of patients who commenced dialysis during the study period: 15 out of 78, Roger 2004 (i); 24 out of 74, Roger 2004 (ii); 8 out of 74, Levin 2005 (i); 11 out of 78, Levin 2005 (ii); 3 out of 82, Ritz 2007 (i); and 2 out of 88, Ritz 2007 (ii).