. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Apr 7.

Published in final edited form as: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Dec;28(6):1393–1401. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21586

Table 1.

Performance of lvGIGA and MASS software compared to manual tracing in 38 patients.

	Manual tracing – lvGIGA (Full volume)			Manual tracing – lvGIGA (Partial volume)			Manual tracing – MASS software

	Absolute	Relative	Corr.	Absolute	Relative	Corr.	Absolute	Relative	Corr.
End diastolic volume	-2.3±5.2 (mL)	-1.7±4.3 (%)	R²=0.99	19.6±8.7 (mL)	13.8±4.5 (%)	R²=0.98	-20.0±6.9 (mL)	-14.3±3.3 (%)	R²=0.99
End systolic volume	-3.6±3.4 (mL)	-8.1±7.8 (%)	R²=0.99	10.0±6.3 (mL)	17.7±6.2 (%)	R²=0.99	-12.7±8.5 (mL)	-23.1±10.1 (%)	R²=0.99
Ejection fraction	2.1±2.2 (%)	3.5±4.1 (%)	R²=0.98	3.5±4.1 (%)	-2.7±3.5 (%)	R²=0.98	2.6±2.7 (%)	4.5±4.5 (%)	R²=0.97
Epicardial volume	-11.4±10.8 (mL)	-4.8±3.7 (%)	R²=0.99	-	-	-	-21.0±20.8 (mL)	-7.7±5.6 (%)	R²=0.96
Myocardial mass	-9.6±13.0 (g)	-9.2±10.8 (%)	R²=0.93	-	-	-	-1.0±20.2 (g)	0.0±12.3 (%)	R²=0.88