TABLE 2.
Analysis of in vivo pollen tube competitive ability in tgd mutants
| KanR/KanS in siliques of self crosses (n)
|
||
|---|---|---|
| Line | Top half | Bottom half |
| tgd1 | 0.2 (237) | 0.2 (258) |
| tgd2 | 0.5 (132) | 0.4 (198) |
| tgd3 | 1.4 (140) | 0.6 (149) |
| tgd4 | 1.5 (163) | 1.0 (131) |
| tgd5 | 0.8 (97) | 0.6 (102) |
| tgd6 | 1.3 (337) | 0.8 (230) |
| tgd7 | 1.4 (128) | 1.0 (104) |
| tgd8 | 1.2 (118) | 0.7 (157) |
| tgd9 | 1.8 (166) | 1.1 (115) |
| tgd10 | 0.2 (114) | 0.2 (135) |
| tgd11 | 0.6 (134) | 0.6 (123) |
| tgd12 | 0.2 (339) | 0.3 (396) |
| tgd13 | 0.2 (366) | 0.1 (316) |
| tgd14 | 1.3 (223) | 0.9 (216) |
| tgd15 | 1.6 (280) | 1.2 (205) |
| tgd16 | 1.3 (154) | 0.8 (159) |
| tgd17 | 1.1 (96) | 0.4 (79) |
| tgd18 | 1.3 (79) | 0.7 (71) |
| tgd19 | 1.3 (253) | 1.0 (356) |
KanR/KanS ratios were scored from seeds collected separately from top and bottom halves of siliques of self crosses of heterozygous plants. n, number of seeds counted.