Skip to main content
. 2009 Apr;181(4):1477–1491. doi: 10.1534/genetics.108.099663

TABLE 2.

Pairwise alignment of Sir1 orthologs and paralogs

S cer Sir1 S kud Sir1 S bay Sir1 S cas Sir1 S kud Kos1 S bay Kos1 S kud Kos2 S bay Kos2 S bay Kos3 S cas Kos3a S cas Kos3b Z rou Kos3
S par Sir1 77 67 61 23 22 22 21 22 23 21 22 23
S mik Sir1 67 63 61 21 23 22 21 22 21 22 22 23
S kud Sir1 63
S bay Sir1 58 66
S cas Sir1 22 24 24
S kud Kos1 22 21 22 23
S bay Kos1 23 21 22 24 65
S kud Kos2 18 20 21 22 21 21
S bay Kos2 22 20 21 21 26 25 62
S bay Kos3 25 19 21 21 22 22 19 20
S bay Kos3a 25 21 23 21 24 20 19 21 37
S cas Kos3b 25 20 23 21 24 21 19 21 37 98
Z rou Kos3 22 21 26 22 21 22 20 21 29 29 26
S cas Kos4 24 23 25 24 26 26 24 23 22 23 23 23

Sequence identity and similarity of Sir1 orthologs and Kos paralogs. All Sir1 family members from S. cerevisiae, S. kudriavzevii, S. bayanus, S. castellii, and Z. rouxii were aligned by BLASTp. Numbers shown represent percentage of identity. Sequences with identity >50% are in boldface type and between 26% and 29% are in italics.