Skip to main content
. 2009 Apr;181(4):1613–1626. doi: 10.1534/genetics.108.094607

TABLE 1.

Power to detect main-effect and interactive loci in a SNP association study using selective genotyping in the context of a three-QTL model, using a selection fraction (α = 20%), and treating the selectively genotyped sample as a case–control study (see text for details)

Power (%)
Three-QTL model
Single-term model
Parameters β1 (% QTL variance) β1 β2 β3 β12 β1 β2 β3 β12
r = 0.5; n = 800 0.1 (0.5) 96 55 78 78 96 52 79 80
0.2 (2.0) 100 53 75 75 100 56 77 79
0.4 (8.0) 100 50 72 66 100 53 80 78
0.6 (18.0) 100 43 67 49 100 51 78 80
0.8 (32.0) 100 37 58 34 100 52 77 82
r = 0.8; n = 2500 0.1 (0.3) 96 51 96 85 97 50 96 88
0.2 (1.3) 100 48 97 82 100 54 97 88
0.4 (5.1) 100 42 93 74 100 55 97 86
0.6 (11.5) 100 33 92 62 100 54 97 86
0.8 (20.5) 100 28 87 57 100 56 96 87

The power corresponds to tests with a significance level of 0.10. It was estimated using 10,000 simulations, and the estimates are correct to ±1%. In the simulations, β0 = 0, β2 = 0.05, β3 = 0.07, and β12 = 0.1; n is the sample size of the “case–control” sample; the actual sample size is 5n. We denote by r the common major allele frequency for the loci. The power to detect the main-effect β1 increases with β1, as expected, but the power to detect other loci and the interaction term (β2, β3, and β12) decreases with β1. The decrease in power is most severe when the variance explained by the strongest locus exceeds 10%.