Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Apr 7.
Published in final edited form as: Physiol Biochem Zool. 2009;82(2):190–201. doi: 10.1086/596513

Table 2.

Quantitative characterization (mean ± SEM) of the adrenocortical response of 15 greater sage grouse to capture, chemical injection (ACTH or saline), and up to 22:43 h of confinement

Injection
Sex
All Birds ACTH Saline Male Female
n 15 7 8 8 7
1° slope (ICM/min)a 4.25 ± 1.19 3.02 ± 1.74 5.31 ± 1.63 5.17 ± 1.64 3.19 ± 1.76
1° peak (1° peak ICM/baseline ICM) 4.27 ± .72 3.74 ± 1.07 4.73 ± 1.00 5.04 ± .97 3.39 ± 1.04
Time to 1° peak (hours:minutes) 2:05 ± 0:08 2:14 ± 0:12 1:59 ± 0:10 2:17 ± 0:09b 1:51 ± 0:11b
2° slope (ICM/min) .73 ± .16 1.18 ± .27c .38 ± .13c .96 ± .21 .18 ± .16
2° peak (2° peak ICM/baseline ICM)d 3.85 ± .92 5.24 ± 1.29 2.63 ± 1.21 5.11 ± 1.20 2.41 ± 1.28

Note. Boldface type indicates statistical significance at P < 0.05.

a

Units for ICM are ng ICM/g dry feces.

b

Sex-wise comparison of time to peak response postcapture by t-test (P = 0.0994) and one-way Wilcoxon test (P = 0.0525).

c

Injection-related difference in 2° response slope (mixed-effects ANCOVA, P = 0.0139 for effect “HPI × injection type”).

d

No statistical analyses to compare group means were performed for this category because of an inconsistent total time of captivity among birds.