Skip to main content
. 2009 Feb 25;25(8):996–1003. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp114

Table 2.

Contact pair prediction accuracy of direct prediction and two-level models on the independent test set

Methods Contact pair prediction
δ-analysis (|δ| = 4)
Accuracy (%)
IMP P-value Accuracy (%)
Direct prediction
    TMhitL2 onlyPred 9.8 (±4.0) 47/480 26.4 1.2e-57 30.6 (±7.8)
    TMhitL2 onlyObs 12.7 (±4.9) 61/480 34.2 1.6e-72 38.5 (±7.3)
Two-level model
    TMhit Pred 12.5 (±4.8) 60/481 33.7 5.4e-80 34.8 (±6.5)
    TMhit Obs 16.0 (±4.5) 77/481 43.1 1.1e-99 41.2 (±7.2)

The standard error (SEboot) estimated by bootstrapping follows the ‘±’ sign.