Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Apr 8.
Published in final edited form as: Mem Cognit. 2008 Jun;36(4):799–812. doi: 10.3758/mc.36.4.799

Table 1.

The Experimental Design

Experiment &
Condition No.
Memory Span
Task(s)
Digit
Presentation Rate
Dual Task N (No. of females)
1a Running Fast None 24 (10)
1b Running Slow None 21 (16)
1c – 1 Running Slow Co-articulation 21 (11)
1c – 2 Running Slow Tapping 21 (11)
1d – 1 Running Fast Co-articulation 18 (16)
1d – 2 Running Fast Tapping 18 (16)
2a – 1 Fixed Slow Co-articulation 18 (6)
2a – 2 Fixed Slow Tapping 18 (6)
2b – 1 Fixed Fast Co-articulation 18 (6)
2b – 2 Fixed Fast Tapping 18 (6)
2c – 1 Fixed Fast None 20 (13)
2c – 2 Fixed Slow None 20 (13)

Note. For experiments with multiple conditions, the same subjects completed all of the tasks.