. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Apr 8.

Published in final edited form as: Mem Cognit. 2008 Jun;36(4):799–812. doi: 10.3758/mc.36.4.799

Table 4.

Analysis of Variance for Repeated-Measures and Subsequent Pair-Wise Comparisons for Effects of the Speeded Task on Running and Fixed-Length List Memory Span

Exp	Rate	Dual Task	ANOVA				Pair-wise comparisons

			df	df_error	F	MSE	cont-anti	cont-pro	anti-pro
Running Memory Span
1a	fast	none	2	46	7.11^*	.03	.46^* (.13)	.11 (.11)	.34^* (.13)
1b	slow	none	2	40	1.41	.83	.32 (.22)	.46 (.25)	.14 (.36)
1c	slow	co-art	2	40	3.80^*	.38	.48^* (.19)	.42^* (.23)	.06 (.14)
	slow	tap	2	40	5.84^*	.42	.68^* (.20)	.26 (.24)	.42^* (.16)
1d	fast	co-art	2	34	3.72^*	.16	.31^* (.15)	.37^* (.14)	.06 (.11)
	fast	tap	2	34	6.46^*	.14	.41^* (.14)	.36^* (.11)	.05 (.12)
Fixed-Length List Memory Span
2a	slow	co-art	2	34	6.03^*	.66	.94^* (.33)	.50^* (.15)	.44^* (.30)
	slow	tap	2	34	2.47	.21	.30 (.19)	.28 (.15)	.02 (.11)
2b	fast	co-art	2	34	12.42^*	.20	.68^* (.17)	.54^* (.14)	.14 (.12)
	fast	tap	2	34	3.57^*	.24	.43^* (.16)	.28^* (.14)	.14 (.14)
2c	fast	none	2	38	6.60^*	.14	.39^* (.13)	.33^* (.12)	.06 (.10)
	slow	none	2	38	2.26	.12	.26 (.11)	.21 (.12)	.06 (.09)

p < .05. Standard deviations in parentheses.

Note. “Exp” = experiment. “Anti”, “Pro”, and “Cont” = the anti-press, pro-press, and speeded-task control condition, respectively. “Co-art” and “Tap” = the co-articulation and knee tapping dual-task conditions, respectively.