Skip to main content
. 2009 Feb 11;89(4):1043–1052. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2008.26938

TABLE 3.

Effects of study interventions on changes in body composition, fat distribution, and aerobic fitness1

CR only (n = 29) CR + moderate-intensity (n = 36) CR + vigorous-intensity (n = 30) P2
ΔBody weight (kg) −11.8 ± 4.1 −12.2 ± 4.5 −12.3 ± 4.9 0.92
ΔTotal fat mass (kg) −7.4 ± 2.8 −8.2 ± 3.2 −8.5 ± 3.8 0.45
ΔTotal lean mass (kg) −4.1 ± 1.9 −3.4 ± 2.0 −3.3 ± 1.7 0.17
ΔPercentage of body fat (%) −3.3 ± 2.0 −4.1 ± 2.2 −4.3 ± 2.2 0.16
ΔRelative Inline graphicO2max (mL · kg bw−1 · min−1) 2.0 ± 2.6 2.5 ± 2.6 4.1 ± 3.73 0.03
ΔAbsolute Inline graphicO2max (mL/min) −71 ± 255 −8 ± 213 68 ± 252 0.10
ΔWaist circumference (cm) −8.9 ± 3.9 −9.3 ± 5.0 −9.9 ± 4.6 0.67
ΔHip circumference (cm) −8.5 ± 4.6 −10.1 ± 4.6 −9.4 ± 3.8 0.35
ΔWHR −0.016 ± 0.039 −0.011 ± 0.044 −0.020 ± 0.038 0.68
ΔAbdominal visceral fat (cm3) −612 ± 338 −591 ± 340 −630 ± 298 0.90
ΔAbdominal subcutaneous fat (cm3) −1051 ± 1023 −1426 ± 764 −1007 ± 1136 0.18
ΔVSF ratio −0.03 ± 0.08 −0.02 ± 0.10 −0.06 ± 0.09 0.34
1

All values are means ± SDs. CR, calorie restriction; Inline graphicO2max, maximal oxygen uptake; bw, body weight; WHR, waist-hip ratio; VSF, visceral-subcutaneous fat.

2

Decreases within each group for all body composition and fat distribution variables were significant, P < 0.0001 for all, except WHR and VSF, P = 0.003 (paired t test). Increases within each group for relative Inline graphicO2max were significant, P < 0.05; changes within group for absolute Inline graphicO2max were not significant.

3

Significantly different from the CR-only and CR + moderate-intensity groups, P < 0.05 (one-factor ANOVA).