Skip to main content
. 2009 Feb 18;89(4):1059–1067. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2008.27182

TABLE 2.

Associations between the intakes of calcium and magnesium and risk of type 2 diabetes1

Median intake Cases Person-years All participants Confirmed diabetes
mg/d n n
Calcium2
 Quintile 1 277.5 708 58,971.9 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
 Quintile 2 383.1 488 59,709.3 0.82 (0.73, 0.92)3 0.81 (0.70, 0.93)
 Quintile 3 462.9 386 59,798.1 0.73 (0.65, 0.83) 0.72 (0.62, 0.84)
 Quintile 4 538.3 341 59,749.5 0.67 (0.59, 0.76) 0.64 (0.54, 0.75)
 Quintile 5 649.6 347 59,515.5 0.74 (0.65, 0.85) 0.73 (0.62, 0.86)
P for trend <0.001 <0.0001
Magnesium2
 Quintile 1 213.8 608 60,133.2 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
 Quintile 2 242.9 455 63,118.5 0.84 (0.74, 0.95) 0.80 (0.69, 0.93)
 Quintile 3 262.5 399 54,231.9 0.84 (0.74, 0.96) 0.85 (0.73, 0.99)
 Quintile 4 282.7 386 60,525.4 0.79 (0.69, 0.90) 0.73 (0.62, 0.85)
 Quintile 5 318.1 422 59,735.4 0.86 (0.75, 0.97) 0.80 (0.68, 0.93)
P for trend <0.001 <0.0001
1

Adjusted for age, energy intake (in kcal/d), BMI (in kg/m2), waist-hip ratio, smoking status, alcohol consumption, physical activity, income level, education level, occupation, and hypertension. Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the effect of calcium and magnesium intakes on the incidence of type 2 diabetes. Tests for trend were performed by entering the categorical variables as continuous parameters in the models.

2

Adjusted for energy.

3

Relative risk; 95% CI in parentheses (all such values).