. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jan 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Jan;35(1):122–136. doi: 10.1037/a0013744

Table 3.

Best-fitting parameter values and measures of goodness of fit for the group fits

	Model
Variable	No Priming	Retrieval	Boundary	Execution
Parameters
η_ct-u	.065	.055	.063	.065
η_ct-a	.408	.384	.402	.408
η_prime-u	.065	.055	.063	.065
η_prime-a	.065	.059	.063	.065
η_prime-p	.065	.062	.063	.065
C	2.25	2.07	-	2.25
C_unprimed	-	-	2.22	-
C_primed	-	-	2.18	-
RT_base	533	498	524	-
RT_{base-unprimed}	-	-	-	536
RT_base-primed	-	-	-	529
Measures of goodness of fit
RMSD	9.6	4.0	9.4	9.4
r²	.9995	.9999	.9995	.9995
RMSD (RT)	12.4	4.4	12.0	12.0
r² (RT)	.7877	.9728	.8002	.8016
RMSD (Acc)	5.7	3.6	5.8	5.7
r² (Acc)	.9553	.9839	.9528	.9553

Note. RMSD = root-mean-squared deviation between data and model predictions; r² = proportion of variance in the data explained by the model; RT = response time; Acc = scaled accuracy. See text for descriptions of model parameters. Bold-faced parameters were free parameters in the model fits.