Skip to main content
. 2009 Apr 10;84(4):445–458. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.03.011

Table 1.

Top Transcript-SNP Pairs with a Significant Effect of Diagnosis

Probe IDa Symbolb Chr.c Bp Positiond Best SNPe S_Chr.f S_Pos.g Otherh Loc.i Raw p Valuej 1K p Valuek Inter p Valuel r2 CAm r2 COn Dir.o
GI_34147330-S ABDH12 20 25.2–25.3 rs6050598 20 25.3 40 cis 1.540 × 10−65 9.990 × 10−4 3.770 × 10−2 0.44 0.38 +
GI_14149802-S ANKRD27 19 37.8–37.9 rs259228 19 37.8 13 cis 1.190 × 10−31 9.990 × 10−4 4.160 × 10−2 0.17 0.31 -
GI_14916517-S AP3M1 10 75.6 rs26133 5 14.2 1 trans 3.280 × 10−9 1.500 × 10−2 7.080 × 10−7 0.13 −0.05 +/−
GI_38261968-S APG12L 5 115.2 rs2483589 10 116.4 1 trans 7.930 × 10−9 2.000 × 10−2 9.490 × 10−4 0.12 −0.04 -
GI_29739147-S ARL16 17 77.3 rs6565624 17 77.3 3 cis 4.360 × 10−12 9.990 × 10−4 4.520 × 10−2 0.04 0.13 -
GI_38327635-S C14orf4 14 76.6 rs1120277 14 76.5 0 cis 1.840 × 10−27 9.990 × 10−4 2.900 × 10−2 0.08 0.27 -
GI_23346408-S C20orf111 20 42.3 a-2038955 1 19.6 0 trans 2.040 × 10−9 2.000 × 10−2 3.440 × 10−6 0.14 −0.05 −/+
GI_25092657-S C7orf27 7 2.5–2.6 rs3936086 16 13.6 1 trans 5.520 × 10−9 1.600 × 10−2 1.050 × 10−6 0.15 −0.05 −/+
GI_37059735-S CWF19L1 10 102 rs11594333 10 101.9 6 cis 4.650 × 10−11 9.990 × 10−4 7.120 × 10−2 −0.01 0.13 +
GI_39995081-S FLJ20303 5 6.7 rs4701742 5 66.7 10 cis 1.180 × 10−51 9.990 × 10−4 5.820 × 10−4 0.24 0.41 +
GI_32698961-S GDPD1 17 54.7 rs7223491 17 54.6 5 cis 5.770 × 10−15 9.990 × 10−4 3.110 × 10−2 0.15 0.01 -
GI_30061497-I GGTL3 20 32.9 rs6087619 20 32.8 23 cis 2.220 × 10−33 9.990 × 10−4 4.230 × 10−2 0.14 0.33 -
GI_22095346-S IGSF4 11 114.5–114.9 rs7125361 11 114.6 5 cis 3.020 × 10−26 9.990 × 10−4 1.270 × 10−2 0.24 0.14 -
GI_29171690-I ILVBL 19 15.1 rs11851301 14 94.2 0 trans 1.780 × 10−9 5.990 × 10−3 2.990 × 10−3 0.12 −0.05 -
GI_37059782-S KIAA0980 20 25.4–25.5 rs6132819 20 25.2 35 cis 1.750 × 10−29 9.990 × 10−4 2.580 × 10−2 0.29 0.15 +
GI_41393558-I KIF1B 1 10.2–10.4 rs12120191 1 10.3 22 cis 1.530 × 10−79 9.990 × 10−4 3.530 × 10−2 0.5 0.41 -
GI_42658911-S LOC401470 8 93.2 rs11171739 12 54.8 5 trans 4.540 × 10−58 9.990 × 10−4 3.120 × 10−2 0.48 0.27 +
GI_38455399-S MADH5 5 135.5 rs2483589 10 116.4 1 trans 3.010 × 10−8 2.100 × 10−2 1.090 × 10−3 0.12 −0.04 -
GI_5174552-S MFAP1 15 41.9 rs17546037 5 7.3 1 trans 7.340 × 10−9 5.990 × 10−3 1.050 × 10−3 0.13 −0.04 -
GI_7662347-S MONDOA 12 121.0–121.2 rs3741452 12 121.2 1 cis 2.620 × 10−28 9.990 × 10−4 3.550 × 10−5 0.04 0.32 -
GI_31881619-A PPA2 4 106.5–106.6 rs2866799 4 106.7 19 cis 1.260 × 10−24 9.990 × 10−4 3.380 × 10−2 0.27 0.1 -
GI_45439315-I PPIE 1 40 rs1180341 1 39.8 2 cis 3.260 × 10−14 9.990 × 10−4 2.800 × 10−2 0.21 0.02 -
GI_19557635-A PPIL3 2 201.4–201.5 rs6715380 2 201.9 14 cis 2.340 × 10−12 9.990 × 10−4 2.470 × 10−2 0.02 0.13 -
GI_15011935-S RPS26 12 54.7 rs11171739 12 54.8 5 cis 1.150 × 10−70 9.990 × 10−4 2.740 × 10−2 0.51 0.33 +
GI_7657430-S SND1 7 127.1–127.5 rs1408015 13 106.9 1 trans 3.150 × 10−8 3.800 × 10−2 1.790 × 10−3 0.14 −0.05 +
GI_5730084-S TCTEL1 6 159 rs10843090 12 28.1 0 trans 1.430 × 10−8 3.000 × 10−2 1.760 × 10−3 0.13 −0.04 +/−
GI_8922751-S TYW1 7 66.1–66.3 rs6966142 7 66 8 cis 1.180 × 10−12 9.990 × 10−4 2.330 × 10−2 0 0.14 +
GI_41281748-I ZNF323 6 28.4 rs149970 6 28.1 8 cis 8.350 × 10−10 6.990 × 10−3 2.510 × 10−2 0.12 −0.02 +

This table shows the list of transcript-SNP pairs that had transcript-specific empirically significant p values by our 2 df model and where there was a significant diagnosis interaction term. Listed is a subset of the effects, generated from the full list of associated transcript-SNP pairs (Table S5). Criteria for generation of subset includes: transcript-specific 2 df model empirical p value from 1000 simulations ≤ 0.05, gene-expression detection rate within both cases and controls ≥ 99%, SNP call rate ≥ 99% overall, minor-allele frequency ≥ 5% in cases and controls, no LD between eQTL SNP and any polymorphism in probe (r2 < 0.8), and SNP accounting for 12% or greater of the variance in transcript expression in either cases of controls (adjusted r2 in cases or controls ≥ 0.12). Genes are listed in alphabetical order. All data are also represented in Table S5.

a

GI illumina probe identifiers.

b

Correlated transcripts.

c

Transcript chromosome.

d

Transcript position (listed in Mb).

e

SNP with the smallest 2 df model–corrected (1000 permutations) p value for that transcript (dbSNP or Affymetrix identifiers listed).

f

SNP chromosome.

g

SNP position (listed in Mb).

h

Number of other SNPs with a 2 df model p value for the transcript that was significant after 1000 permutations (α = 0.05).

i

Where the SNP was in cis or trans to the transcript.

j

Uncorrected p value for the 2 df model.

k

p value after correction of the 2 df model using 1000 permutations.

l

p values for the interaction term in the 2 df model.

m

Adjusted correlation coefficients for the 2 df model in cases.

n

Adjusted correlation coefficients for the 2 df model in controls.

o

Direction of the effect as indicated by the sample-specific β values. A plus sign indicates positive correlation and a major allele associated with high expression, and a minus sign indicates negative correlation and a minor allele associated with high expression. “+/−” or “−/+” indicates that direction of effect is different in case and controls, with the data given as direction in cases/direction in controls. Note that the latter effects were seen in trans and suggest a more complex model for effect whereby the uncaptured intermediary acts differently within case and control samples.