Table 2.
Comparison of Family-Based versus Published Case-Control GWA Findings for the Signals Identified in the NIMH 500K Screen
| SNP | Model | NIMH (500K) |
TGEN8 |
GSK10 |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| p (two-tailed) | Fams | p (one-tailed) | n (AD + CTRL) | p (one-tailed) | n (AD + CTRL) | ||
| rs11159647, with affection status | add | 0.05 | 128 | 0.04 | 1384 | 0.9∗ | 1315 |
| rs179943, with affection status | add | 0.007 | 55 | 0.8∗ | 1376 | 0.5∗ | 1368 |
| rs3826656, with affection status | dom | 0.02 | 90 | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. |
| rs2049161, with affection status | add | 0.04 | 78 | 0.2 | 1407 | 0.045 | 1386 |
Family-based (NIMH) p values are two sided and identical to those of Table 1. Case-control (TGEN7 and GSK10) p values are one sided, on the basis of an allelic chi-square test (1 d.f.) with the genotype frequencies of the original publications (note that the FBAT-GEE and age of onset statistics could not be computed here because of the lack of onset-age data in the original reports). The results presented in this table are based on the complete data sets made available by the authors of the respective studies. Fams, informative families. The asterisks represent association with opposite allele as compared to 500K analyses (see identity of associated alleles in legend to Table 1). “N.A.” represents no data provided for this marker. Significant p values are represented in bold.