Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2008 Sep;60(3):749–760. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21675

Figure 4.

Figure 4

A. Numerical simulations demonstrating temporal fidelity as a function of temporal footprint of a (i) reference N4, elliptical centric (EC) encoded, 128×64 CAPR sampling pattern (Table 1, Acq. 2) as compared to (ii) two-fold (Table 1, Acq. 4) and (iii) four-fold SENSE (Table 1, Acq. 7) accelerated imaging of the same sequence. Temporal footprints of all three sequences are also shown to scale. B. Results similar to (A) except for reverse elliptical centric ordering. C. Numerical simulations demonstrating temporal fidelity as a function of temporal footprint of a (i) reference N4, EC, 128×64 (Table 1, Acq. 2) sampling pattern as compared to 4× SENSE accelerated imaging various levels of view sharing (Table 1, Acq. 5, 7, 8, and 9).