Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1988 Oct;26(10):2144–2146. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.10.2144-2146.1988

Evaluation of the KOH test and the antibiotic disk test in routine clinical anaerobic bacteriology.

A M Bourgault 1, F Lamothe 1
PMCID: PMC266833  PMID: 3183000

Abstract

We have evaluated the KOH test, the antibiotic disk identification test, and the Gram stain reaction for the preliminary grouping of gram-positive and gram-negative anaerobes and have assessed the value of erythromycin 60-micrograms-disk resistance as a predictive index of clindamycin resistance among anaerobes. By testing 931 clinical isolates, 281 gram positive and 650 gram negative, with the KOH test and vancomycin 5-micrograms-disk test, we obtained the following parameters: sensitivity, 89.7 and 97.1%; specificity, 97.5 and 98.3%; positive predictive value, 80.4 and 98.7%; and efficiency, 92.1 and 98% for the KOH test and the vancomycin test, respectively. The KOH reaction incorrectly grouped 42 of 97 Bacteroides bivius and 12 of 50 pigmented Bacteroides strains. The vancomycin test correctly identified 63 of 67 gram-negative strains that had given a negative KOH reaction. The erythromycin disk result correctly predicted clindamycin resistance in gram-negative isolates but had a sensitivity of 85.7%, a specificity of 92.4%, and a positive predictive value of 42.8% for gram-positive isolates. Therefore, the use of these preliminary identification tests can assist in the correct grouping of anaerobes and accurately predict significant clindamycin resistance in gram-negative anaerobic bacteria.

Full text

PDF
2144

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Halebian S., Harris B., Finegold S. M., Rolfe R. D. Rapid method that aids in distinguishing Gram-positive from Gram-negative anaerobic bacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Mar;13(3):444–448. doi: 10.1128/jcm.13.3.444-448.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Sutter V. L., Finegold S. M. Antibiotic disc susceptibility tests for rapid presumptive identification of Gram-negative anaerobic bacilli. Appl Microbiol. 1971 Jan;21(1):13–20. doi: 10.1128/am.21.1.13-20.1971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Wilkins T. D., Chalgren S. Medium for use in antibiotic susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Dec;10(6):926–928. doi: 10.1128/aac.10.6.926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES