Skip to main content
. 2008 Jan 22;46(2):147–158. doi: 10.1007/s11517-007-0302-y

Table 1.

Quantitative comparison of signals between thoracic belt method and EDR

Subject Respiration rate/min (bpm) Correlation coefficient
Thoracic belt method EDR signal
Type I Type III Type I Type III
A 21.2 21.2 21.2 0.93 0.43
B 16.1 16.3 18.4 0.85 0.44
C 16.3 16.3 17.0 0.82 0.27
D 18.2 18.2 22.6 0.92 0.31
E 17.3 17.9 17.3 0.39 0.87
F 12.1 8.4 12.1 0.61 0.83
G 9.9 9.9 8.2 0.91 0.30
H 16.4 16.4 16.4 0.87 0.90
I 15.2 15.2 13.5 0.81 0.57
J 14.6 14.6 9.7 0.80 0.16
K 25.6 23.2 25.6 0.31 0.33
L 12.3 12.3 12.3 0.87 0.80
M 6.2 8.1 6.2 0.30 0.95
N 18.3 11.1 18.3 0.39 0.82
O 17.3 17.3 16.6 0.87 0.83