Skip to main content
. 2009 Apr 28;3(4):e421. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000421

Table 1. Comparison of SIgT test and ELISA for human, small mammal and dog serum samples.

SIgT test ELISA
Human Small mammal Dog
N (n = 223) P (n = 65) N (n = 278) P (n = 74) N (n = 49) P (n = 14)
N 219 (98.2%) 10 (15.4%) 251 (90.3%) 9 (12.2%) 48 (98%) 1 (7.2%)
P 4 (1.8%) 55 (84.6%) 27 (9.7%) 65 (87.8%) 1 (2%) 13 (92.8%)

N : Negative, P: Positive, n: sample number.