Table 3.
Estimations of sample size per arm for a hypothetical trial to detect 25% rate slowing with 90% power and α = 0.05
Study design | Alzheimer's disease | Mild cognitive impairment |
---|---|---|
MRI Hippocampal volume | ||
Two scans, 0–6 ma | 462 | 949 |
Two scans, 0–12 ma | 252 | 698 |
Three scans, 0–6–12 ma | 255 | 673 |
Three scans + ApoE4b | 196 | 672 |
Three scans + MCc | 140 | 383 |
Three scans + MC + ApoE4d | 86 | 341 |
ADAS-Coge | ||
Two tests, 0–6 m | 745 | 4663 |
Two tests, 0–12 m | 814 | 9350 |
Three tests, 0–6–12 m | 569 | 8354 |
MMSEe | ||
Two tests, 0–6 m | 1280 | 6300 |
Two tests, 0–12 m | 1083 | 3900 |
Three tests, 0–6–12 m | 780 | 3353 |
a Based on MRI scans at baseline (0 m), 6 (6 m) and/or 12 months (12 m).
b Accounting for ApoE4 profile.
c Using the Markov chain approach (see text for details).
d Using ApoE4 and Markov chain together.
e Using the Markov chain approach did not significantly improve sample size.