Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Apr 14.
Published in final edited form as: Pain. 2008 Apr 9;139(1):5–14. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2008.02.023

Table 4.

Table 4A. Median effective dose (ED50) for the sequential allocation (SA) study
Analysis Group A (n = 25) Group G (n = 19) ED50 ratio (A:G) p-Value
Up-down analysis 26.8 (22.7–30.9) 17.7 (13.4–21.9) 1.51 (1.18–2.01) 0.009
Probit regression 27.5 (24.7–30.3) 17.3 (14.3–20.3) 1.59 (1.30–1.98) 0.009
Table 4B. Median effective dose (ED50) for random allocation (RA) study using probit analysis
ED50 (95% CI) μg Group A (n = 77) Group G (n = 20) All subjects (n = 97)
Spontaneous labor (n = 52) 29.1 (22.3–35.9) 15.8 (4.7–26.9) 27.4 (20.7–34.2)
Induced labor (n = 45) 24.3 (17.8–30.9) 10.4 (1.7–19.2) 21.8 (14.8–28.8)
All subjects 27.4 (22.5–32.2) 12.8 (5.5–20.0) 25.4 (19.6–31.1)

Results are ED50 (μg) or ratio with 95% confidence interval.

Group A: 304A homozygotes.

Group G: 304A/G heterozygotes (n = 17) and 304G homozygotes (n = 2).

ED50 ratio (A:G) for genotype is 2.14 (95% CI 1.305.17), p = 0.002.

ED50 ratio (spontaneous:induced) for labor onset is 1.26 (95% CI 0.841.97), p = 0.23.

Tests for goodness of fit and parallelism were p = 0.53 and p = 0.16, respectively.

Group A: 304A homozygotes.

Group G: 304A/G heterozygotes (n = 16) and 304G homozygotes (n = 4).