TABLE 2.
Frequency of RNAP II::GFP dispersal in the wild-type, cdk1F, Anfcp1TS, and Anfcp1TS cdk1F strains at 37°Ca
| Expt | No. of cells (%)
|
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wild type
|
cdk1F
|
Anfcp1ts
|
Anfcp1ts cdk1F
|
|||||
| Dispersed | Total | Dispersed | Total | Dispersed | Total | Dispersed | Total | |
| 1 | 8 | 234 | 9 | 220 | 43 | 726 | 76 | 797 |
| 2 | 19 | 515 | 22 | 530 | 46 | 571 | 46 | 543 |
| 3 | 31 | 812 | 31 | 826 | 30 | 851 | 81 | 822 |
| Total | 58 (3.7) | 1561 | 62 (3.9) | 1,576 | 119 (5.5) | 2,148 | 203 (9.4) | 2,162 |
Cells of individual strains were grown for 8 h at 37°C and fixed. The cells in which the RNAP II::GFP signal was dispersed were counted, as well as the total number of cells. The experiments were repeated three times independently. Student t test analysis indicated that only the difference between the wild-type and the Anfcp1ts cdk1F strains was significant (P < 0.0005).