Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Apr 15.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Intern Med. 2007 Sep 10;167(16):1745–1751. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.16.1745

Table 4. Hazard Ratios (HRs) and 95% Confidence Intervals for Hip Fracture (HF) Stratified by Age Groups From Cox Proportional Hazards Regression Modelsa.

Age<80 y
(n = 659)
Age ≥80 y
(n = 161)


Brain MR
Imaging
Pattern
Crude Plus Age
and Sex
Plus
Osteoporosis
Plus
Other
Risk
Factorsb
Plus
Variables in
the Causal
Pathwayc
Crude Plus Age
and Sex
Plus
Osteoporosis
Plus
Other Risk
Factorsb
Plus
Variables in
the Causal
Pathwayc
Diffuse WMLs 3.1
(1.2-7.9)
P=.002
2.7
(1.0-6.9)
P=.01
2.7
(1.0-6.9)
P=.03
2.7
(1.1-7.1)
P=.04
2.4
(0.9-7.1)
P=.07
1.1
(0.3-3.7)
0.9
(0.2-3.0)
0.6
(0.1-2.2)
0.5
(0.1-2.9)
0.5
(0.1-3.3)
Focal lesions 1.9
(0.5-6.7)
2.1
(0.6-7.8)
2.3
(0.6-8.6)
2.0
(0.6-7.6)
2.1
(0.5-8.2)
0.34
(0.04-3.30)
0.20
(0.02-2.30)
0.20
(0.02-1.70)
0.15
(0.01-1.60)
0.2
(0.1-2.4)
No lesions 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference]

Abbreviations: MR, magnetic resonance; WMLs, white matter lesions.

a

Data are given as HR (95% confidence interval) unless otherwise indicated. Variables were considered for these models if P<.10 in bivariate analyses.

b

Education, smoking, and number of medications.

c

Previous HF, previous falls, physical activity, systolic blood pressure, Mini-Mental State Examination score, short physical performance battery score, and taking high blood pressure medication.