Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1988 Dec;26(12):2561–2563. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.12.2561-2563.1988

Calculation of antibody affinity in homogeneous and heterogeneous systems.

R R Chalquest 1
PMCID: PMC266946  PMID: 3230134

Abstract

Antibody affinity is an important determinant of all antibody-antigen reactions. A new computer program, AFCRV, was developed to calculate binding constants with data from a radioimmunoassay on most microcomputers in the laboratory by using constant-ratio dilution curves. Evaluation of a homogeneous or heterogeneous antibody in the presence of a single antigen can be accomplished.

Full text

PDF
2561

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Klotz I. M. Numbers of receptor sites from Scatchard graphs: facts and fantasies. Science. 1982 Sep 24;217(4566):1247–1249. doi: 10.1126/science.6287580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Light K. E. Analyzing nonlinear scatchard plots. Science. 1984 Jan 6;223(4631):76–78. doi: 10.1126/science.6546323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Lowder J. N., Meeker T. C., Campbell M., Garcia C. F., Gralow J., Miller R. A., Warnke R., Levy R. Studies on B lymphoid tumors treated with monoclonal anti-idiotype antibodies: correlation with clinical responses. Blood. 1987 Jan;69(1):199–210. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Mariani M., Neri P., Cianfriglia M., Armellini D., Barbarulli G., Antoni G. Characterization of monoclonal antibodies against human chorionic somatomammotropin: competitive screening and determination of the affinity constants. J Immunol Methods. 1984 Jun 8;71(1):43–48. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(84)90204-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Moyle W. R., Lin C., Corson R. L., Ehrlich P. H. Quantitative explanation for increased affinity shown by mixtures of monoclonal antibodies: importance of a circular complex. Mol Immunol. 1983 Apr;20(4):439–452. doi: 10.1016/0161-5890(83)90025-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Nelson D. P., Griswold W. R. Computer modeling of the reaction between antigen and heterogeneous antibody in fixed antigen excess: a new method for measuring antibody affinity. J Clin Lab Immunol. 1986 Oct;21(2):101–106. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Nimmo G. R., Lew A. M., Stanley C. M., Steward M. W. Influence of antibody affinity on the performance of different antibody assays. J Immunol Methods. 1984 Aug 3;72(1):177–187. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(84)90446-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Péterfy F., Kuusela P., Mäkelä O. Affinity requirements for antibody assays mapped by monoclonal antibodies. J Immunol. 1983 Apr;130(4):1809–1813. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Steward M. W., Lew A. M. The importance of antibody affinity in the performance of immunoassays for antibody. J Immunol Methods. 1985 Apr 22;78(2):173–190. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(85)90074-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Van Heyningen V., Brock D. J., Van Heyningen S. A simple method for ranking the affinities of monoclonal antibodies. J Immunol Methods. 1983 Aug 26;62(2):147–153. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(83)90000-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES