Skip to main content
. 2009 Jan 21;3:1–8. doi: 10.2174/1874091X00903010001

Table 5.

Accuracy with which the Domain Boundaries are Identified by Various Prediction Methods

Method Pc_c Delta_b Delta_e
baker 56.2 -1.2(0.3) 2.2(0.5)
chop 26.1 -2.9(1.0) 1.9(0.7)
chophomo 25.0 -2.6(1.0) 2.9(1.0)
distill 33.6 -1.5(0.6) 3.2(0.8)
domfold 38.0 -1.9(0.6) 2.9(0.7)
domssea 42.9 -1.7(0.6) 2.5(0.7)
dps 38.7 -2.2(0.8) 1.6(0.9)
foldpro 62.8 -1.3(0.4) 2.0(0.4)
hhpred1 43.3 -2.1(0.5) 2.6(0.5)
hhpred3 43.4 -2.1(0.5) 2.7(0.5)
maopus 54.2 -1.4(0.6) 3.0(0.8)
metadp 39.8 -1.3(0.7) 3.3(0.7)
NNput 30.8 -1.9(0.7) 2.4(0.8)
robetta 57.9 -1.0(0.3) 1.5(0.5)

The following data are shown: the percentage of domains that are correctly predicted (see text for details) PC_C, the average deviation between the real and the predicted beginning of the domain Delta_b, and the average difference between the real and the predicted end of the domain Delta_e (standard deviations of the mean in parentheses).