Skip to main content
. 2009 Apr 24;4(4):e5350. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005350

Table 1. Summary of performance of SNP by source.

SNP source1 Number of SNP available for selection2 Estimated conversion rate (%)3 Number of SNP selected for the BovineSNP504 (% of assay) Number of SNP producing calls (%)5 Number confirmed SNP (%)6 Average MAF7
Draft 235,725 85 10,244 (17.6) 9,361 (91.4) 9,284 (99.1) 0.24
Interbreed 73,127 84 6,035 (10.3) 5,493 (91.0) 5,244 (95.5) 0.24
BAC 36,387 82 1,526 (2.6) 1,409 (92.3) 1,239 (87.9) 0.24
RRL 65,180 92 25,833 (44.3) 23,840 (92.3) 21,914 (91.9) 0.25
HapMap 29,853 1008 13,236 (22.7) 12,613 (95.3) 12,503 (99.1) 0.26
Parentage 121 1008 121 (0.2) 116 (95.9) 116 (100) 0.31
Various 4399 1008 1341 (2.3) 1,169 (87.2) 1,083 (92.6) 0.26
Total 444,792 NA9 58,336 54,001 (92.6) 51,383 (95.1) 0.26
1

Sources of SNP are defined in Materials and Methods.

2

The number of SNP input to the spacing/selection algorithm.

3

Percent of markers detected as polymorphic in validation studies which tested from 48 to 25,125 SNP.

4

BovineSNP50 is the name of the developed high-density genotyping assay.

5

Number of markers that produced genotype calls (>90% call rate) among the 556 tested animals.

6

Number of SNP for which at least one animal was heterozygous among the 556 tested animals and percent of the total number of markers producing genotype calls.

7

Average minor allele frequency among the 556 animals in the validation panel.

8

SNP selected from these sources had previously been shown to be informative in some populations.

9

NA = not applicable.