Skip to main content
. 2009 Mar 17;100(7):1128–1134. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604967

Table 1. Mean and s.d. of Mcm2, Ki67 and geminin LI and median with percentiles in the Mcm2/Ki67 and geminin/Ki67 ratios in NOM, all OEDs and OSCC.

Labelling index mean (s.d.) Median (25–75%)
  Mcm2 Ki67 Geminin Stat. GLM Mcm2/Ki67 ratio Geminin/Ki67 ratio
NOM (n=15) 39.94 (8.1) 22.94 (5.2) 9.95 (2.1) P<0.001 1.75 (1.42–2.11) 0.43 (0.37–0.56)
OED (n=81) 73.62 (12.1) 44.55 (11.1) 24.40 (7.2) P<0.001 1.75 (1.42–1.97)a 0.54 (0.47–0.62)
OSCC (n=38) 81.16 (4.9) 59.03 (9.6) 34.08 (6.3) P<0.001 1.36 (1.23–1.55) 0.58 (0.51–0.62)
ANOVA test P<0.001 P<0.001 P<0.001   P⧫=0.00 P⧫=0.01

Abbreviations: All OED=all oral epithelial dysplasias (OED that progressed and did not progress to OSCC); GLM=general linear model; NOM=normal oral mucosa; OSCC=oral squamous-cell carcinomas from progressing OED; P⧫=Kruskal-Wallis test; ANOVA=analysis of variance.

a

Note: The median Mcm2/Ki67 OED has a lower 75 percentile than NOM, therefore it has proportionally fewer high values, meaning it is actually lower hence the Kruskal–Wallis test.