Table 2.
Bone mineral and area parameters of the femur and L4 vertebral body assessed ex vivo using DXA
| ZDF Comparison |
ZDSD vs. Parent Strain | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZDFfa/+ (n = 12) | ZDFfa/fa (n = 12) | P | Control (nondiabetic)* (n = 12) | ZDSD (n = 17) | P | |
| BMD, g/cm2 | ||||||
| Whole femur | 0.255±0.006 | 0.196±0.002 | <0.001 | 0.279±0.008 | 0.254±0.005 | <0.050 |
| Femur midshaft | 0.264±0.008 | 0.211±0.002 | <0.001 | 0.294±0.009 | 0.280±0.006 | 0.183 |
| L4 vertebra | 0.140±0.002 | 0.102±0.003 | <0.001 | 0.148±0.004 | 0.139±0.009 | <0.005 |
| BMC, g | ||||||
| Whole femur | 0.700±0.036 | 0.442±0.028 | <0.001 | 0.940±0.032 | 0.750±0.022 | <0.001 |
| Femur midshaft | 0.074±0.001 | 0.054±0.001 | <0.001 | 0.093±0.003 | 0.083±0.003 | <0.050 |
| L4 vertebra | 0.097±0.006 | 0.061±0.002 | <0.001 | 0.108±0.005 | 0.087±0.003 | <0.010 |
| Area, cm2 | ||||||
| Whole femur | 2.74±0.139 | 2.25±0.131 | <0.001 | 3.38±0.107 | 2.95±0.037 | <0.001 |
| Femur midshaft | 0.283±0.004 | 0.257±0.004 | <0.001 | 0.294±0.025 | 0.301±0.004 | 0.150 |
| L4 vertebra | 0.685±0.031 | 0.561±0.049 | <0.050 | 0.682±0.060 | 0.668±0.027 | 0.183 |
Values are means ± SE. DXA, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; BMD, bone mineral density; BMC, bone mineral content. Scanning orientation of vertebral body is the dorsal aspect resting on the imaging stage.
Charles River Laboratory:CD rats was used as one of the parent strains to develop the ZDSD rats.