Skip to main content
. 2009 Jan 21;296(4):E765–E774. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.90937.2008

Table 2.

Bone mineral and area parameters of the femur and L4 vertebral body assessed ex vivo using DXA

ZDF Comparison
ZDSD vs. Parent Strain
ZDFfa/+ (n = 12) ZDFfa/fa (n = 12) P Control (nondiabetic)* (n = 12) ZDSD (n = 17) P
BMD, g/cm2
    Whole femur 0.255±0.006 0.196±0.002 <0.001 0.279±0.008 0.254±0.005 <0.050
    Femur midshaft 0.264±0.008 0.211±0.002 <0.001 0.294±0.009 0.280±0.006 0.183
    L4 vertebra 0.140±0.002 0.102±0.003 <0.001 0.148±0.004 0.139±0.009 <0.005
BMC, g
    Whole femur 0.700±0.036 0.442±0.028 <0.001 0.940±0.032 0.750±0.022 <0.001
    Femur midshaft 0.074±0.001 0.054±0.001 <0.001 0.093±0.003 0.083±0.003 <0.050
    L4 vertebra 0.097±0.006 0.061±0.002 <0.001 0.108±0.005 0.087±0.003 <0.010
Area, cm2
    Whole femur 2.74±0.139 2.25±0.131 <0.001 3.38±0.107 2.95±0.037 <0.001
    Femur midshaft 0.283±0.004 0.257±0.004 <0.001 0.294±0.025 0.301±0.004 0.150
    L4 vertebra 0.685±0.031 0.561±0.049 <0.050 0.682±0.060 0.668±0.027 0.183

Values are means ± SE. DXA, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; BMD, bone mineral density; BMC, bone mineral content. Scanning orientation of vertebral body is the dorsal aspect resting on the imaging stage.

*

Charles River Laboratory:CD rats was used as one of the parent strains to develop the ZDSD rats.