Skip to main content
. 2009 Mar 6;10:12. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-10-12

Table 5.

Comparison of Chromosome 4 and 11 ENU Balancer Screens

Parameter Chr 4
(117–281)
Chr 4
(281–51)
Chr 11
(Trp53-Wnt3)
Interval Breakpoints 96.4–129.8 Mb 129.8–154.4 Mb 69.4–103.7 Mb

Interval size 33 Mb 25 Mb 34 Mb

Number of annotated genes 470 461 905

Pedigrees screened 530 551 785

Lethal lines 11 19 59

Other viable phenotypes 0 4 32

Total mutations 11 23 91

Mutations/Mb 0.33 0.92 2.68

Homogeneity of samplesa 3.913, p < 0.05 22.8, p < 0.001 37.2, p < 0.001

Frequency of mutations mapping outside of the balancer region 1 in 5.4 1 in 4.8 1 in 4.2

Literature Reference This report Hentges et al. 2006 [4] Kile et al. 2003 [5]

In all cases, the phenotype screen included a coat color screen for all lethals in the balancer region. It also included a complete blood count for all blood cell parameters, a screen for neutral cholesterols using tandem mass spectrometry, a urine screen for albumin and glucose, and a general visual assessment of skin, coat, eyes, fur, movement and balance, as well as morphology on all viable mice, which would carry mutations segregating to the balancer region or elsewhere in the genome.

a A Chi square test for homogeneity of samples in a binomial distribution with one degree of freedom. The values represent the significance from the numbers of mutations isolated in the next column, with the exception that the number in column c is the difference from column a.