Skip to main content
. 2009 Mar 5;9:19. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-9-19

Table 5.

Univariate Analyses of surveyed practitioners' weight management practices and Selected Characteristics of the Practitioners

Practitioner Characteristic Provision of Nutritional Intervention Provision of Counseling Provision of Support Groups Provision of Social Work Intervention Provision of Physical Activity Intervention Cultural Considerations in Weight Management Approach
Sex (Male vs. Female) 0.90
(0.76, 1.07)
1.13
(0.98, 1.29)
0.89
(0.75, 1.05)
0.89
(0.74, 1.06)
1.33
(1.16, 1.51)
0.84
(0.74, 0.96)

Race (white vs. Non-white) 0.80
(0.65, 0.99)
0.78
(0.66, 0.92)
0.93
(0.76, 1.13)
0.77
(0.63, 0.94)
0.68
(0.58, 0.79)
0.63
(0.54, 0.74)

Ethnicity (Non-Hispanic vs. Hispanic) 0.88
(0.58, 1.33)
0.83
(0.60, 1.15)
0.69
(0.49, 0.99)
0.92
(0.62, 1.37)
0.90
(0.66, 1.22)
0.67
(0.49, 0.91)

Professional Experience (<5 years vs. ≥ 5 years) 1.22
(0.96, 1.56)
0.77
(0.64, 0.92)
0.90
(0.72, 1.14)
1.15
(0.91, 1.45)
1.22
(1.01, 1.45)
1.40
(1.17, 1.67)

Subspecialty Status (Generalist vs. Subspecialist) 1.92
(1.61, 2.33)
1.56
(1.35, 1.85)
1.25
(1.02, 1.52)
0.46
(0.38, 0.56)
1.30
(1.11, 1.52)
1.41
(1.20, 1.66)

Results are presented as unadjusted odds ratio (95% confidence intervals). Odds ratios represent the odds of participants categorized according to selected variables offering vs. not offering certain services for weight management.