Skip to main content
. 2009 Apr 16;8:66. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-8-66

Table 2.

Specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) of fever as policy recommendations compared with malaria disease*, stratified by transmission intensity and age categories

Very high transmission districts
n/N,% (95% CI)
Moderate-to-high transmission districts
n/N,% (95% CI)
All districts
n/N,% (95% CI)
All age groups

 Specificity 101/403, 25.1 (19.7–30.5) 208/723, 28.8 (24.7–32.9) 309/1126, 27.4 (24.2–30.7)

 PPV 175/477, 36.7 (32.1–41.3) 184/699, 26.3 (22.4–30.3) 359/1176, 30.5 (27.4–33.6)

Patients <5 years

 Specificity 16/102, 15.7 (7.9–23.4) 40/190, 21.1 (15.8–26.3) 56/292, 19.2 (14.9–23.5)

 PPV 104/190, 54.7 (49.1–60.4) 98/248, 39.5 (31.8–47.3) 202/438, 46.1 (41.0–51.3)

Patients ≥5 years

 Specificity 85/301, 28.2 (21.7–34.7) 168/533, 31.5 (26.4–36.6) 253/834, 30.3 (26.4–34.3)

 PPV 71/287, 24.7 (20.0–29.5) 86/451, 19.1 (15.1–23.0) 157/738, 21.3 (18.2–24.3)

* Defined as any malaria parasitaemia on expert slide examination in patient with fever

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure