Table 3.
Studies showing association between relatives’ understanding of brain stem death and consent rate for organ donation. Numbers are percentages of relatives consenting to organ donation when factor was present or not
Study | No studied | Type of study | Factors associated with consent | % consenting | P value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
With factor | Without factor | |||||
Siminoff et al,w1 2001, US | 420 | Retrospective data collection via chart reviews, and telephone interviews with healthcare practitioners or OPO staff, and face to face interviews with family for all donor eligible deaths | Family believed patient had died when brain stem death was confirmed | 63 | 48* | 0.001 |
DeJong et al,w3 1998, US | 164 | Structured telephone interview with immediate next of kin 4-6 months after death of relative | Family understood that people cannot recover when they are brain stem dead | 80 | 48 | <0.001 |
Family understood someone is brain stem dead even though heart is still beating | 80 | 60 | <0.02 | |||
Rodrigue et al,w4 2006, US | 285 | Retrospective structured telephone interview with next of kin of donor eligible deceased individuals | Adequate knowledge of brain stem death | 71 | 27* | <0.001 |
Explanation of brain stem death given | 74 | 43* | <0.001 | |||
Rosel et al,w5 1999, Spain | 71 | Postal survey sent to all families who had been approached for organ donation at single hospital within 12 month period | Understanding of brain stem death | NA | NA | <0.01 |
Jenkins et al,w6 1998, US | NA | Before and after study after implementation of rapid brain death protocol | After rapid brain stem death protocol with nuclear medicine scan to confirm brain death consent rate increased | 71 | 44 | <0.01 |
Frutos et al,w19 1998-2003, Spain | 268 | Family interview with families of possible donors accepted for transplant | Acceptance of brain stem death | 67 | 51 | 0.044 |
OPO=organ procurement organisation; NA=not available (data not given).
*Calculated from published data.